Research Ethics - Critique

Boser, S. (2007). Power, Ethics, and the IRB: Dissonance Over Human Participant Review of Participatory Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1060–1074. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407308220

Bosk, C. L., & De Vries, R. G. (2004). Bureaucracies of Mass Deception: Institutional Review Boards and the Ethics of Ethnographic Research. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204266913

Brown, C., Spiro, J., & Quinton, S. (2020). The role of research ethics committees: Friend or foe in educational research? An exploratory study. British Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 747–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3654

de Albuquerque Rocha, K., & Vasconcelos, S. M. R. (2019). Compliance with National Ethics Requirements for Human-Subject Research in Non-biomedical Sciences in Brazil: A Changing Culture? Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(3), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0028-2

De Vries, R., DeBruin, D. A., & Goodgame, A. (2004). Ethics Review of Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research: Where Should We Go From Here? Ethics & Behavior, 14(4), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1404_6

Dingwall, R. (2008). The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research. Twenty-First Century Society, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450140701749189

DuBois, J. M. (2004). Is Compliance a Professional Virtue of Researchers? Reflections on Promoting the Responsible Conduct of Research. Ethics & Behavior, 14(4), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1404_8

Edwards, S. J. L. (2004). Research ethics committees and paternalism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(1), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2002.000166

Eisenberg, A., & Amato, J. (2018). Participatory Research Ethics—Aruskipt’asipxaňanakasakipunirakispawa. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 17. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.17.3.1-11

Gontcharov, I. (2013). Methodological Crisis in the Social Sciences: The New Brunswick Declaration as a New Paradigm in Research Ethics Governance? Transnational Legal Theory, 4(1), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.5235/20414005.4.1.146

Gontcharov, I. (2016). A New Wave of Positivism in the Social Sciences: Regulatory Capture and Conceptual Constraints in the Governance of Research Involving Humans. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2861908

Guillemin, M., Gillam, L., Rosenthal, D., & Bolitho, A. (2012). Human Research Ethics Committees: Examining Their Roles and Practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(3), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.38

Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3

Hamburger, P. (2005). The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.721363

Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: On the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802170288

Hedgecoe, A. (2006). Research ethics committees in Europe: Implementing the directive, respecting diversity. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(8), 483–486. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.013888

Keith-Spiegel, P., & Koocher, G. P. (2005). The IRB Paradox: Could the Protectors Also Encourage Deceit? Ethics & Behavior, 15(4), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1504_5

Keith-Spiegel, P., Koocher, G. P., & Tabachnick, B. (2006). What Scientists Want from Their Research Ethics Committee. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.67

Kritikos, M. (2020). Research Ethics Governance: The European Situation. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (pp. 33–50). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_1

Librett, M., & Perrone, D. (2010). Apples and oranges: Ethnography and the IRB. Qualitative Research, 10(6), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110380548

Lincoln, Y. S., & Tierney, W. G. (2004). Qualitative Research and Institutional Review Boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262361

Malouff, J., & Schutte, N. (2005). Academic psychologists’ perspectives on the human research ethics review process. Australian Psychologist, 40(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060512331317166

Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and Wrongs in Social Science Research: An Evaluator’s Guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/019384102236520

Opsal, T., Wolgemuth, J., Cross, J., Kaanta, T., Dickmann, E., Colomer, S., & Erdil-Moody, Z. (2016). “There Are No Known Benefits . . .”: Considering the Risk/Benefit Ratio of Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1137–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315580109

Peled-Raz, M., Tzafrir, S. S., Enosh, G., Efron, Y., & Doron, I. (Issi). (2021). Ethics Review Boards for Research With Human Participants: Past, Present, and Future. Qualitative Health Research, 31(3), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320972333

Perry, K. H. (2011). Ethics, Vulnerability, and Speakers of Other Languages: How University IRBs (Do Not) Speak to Research Involving Refugee Participants. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(10), 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411425006

Schrag, Z. M. (2010). Ethical imperialism: Institutional review boards and the social sciences, 1965–2009. JHU Press.

Schrag, Z. M. (2011). The Case against Ethics Review in the Social Sciences. Research Ethics, 7(4), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700402

Tauri, J. M. (2014). Resisting Condescending Research Ethics in Aotearoa New Zealand. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 10(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/117718011401000204

The New Brunswick Declaration. (2013, February 13). https://the-sra.org.uk/SRA/Ethics/New-Brunswick-Declaration/SRA/Ethics/The-New-Brunswick-Declaration.aspx?hkey=2ea5b0a6-c499-45e4-9595-626bea495ff1

Van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2011). The seduction of ethics: Transforming the social sciences. University of Toronto Press.

Van Den Hoonaard, W. C. (2013). The “Ethics Rupture” Summit, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, October 25–28, 2012. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.3

Wainwright, P. (2004). What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(3), 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.004051